Production Systems And Income Generation From The Smallholder Beef Cattle Farming In Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia

Rini Widiati, Tri Satya Mastuti Widi

Abstract


This study was aimed to determine the production systems of beef cattle which can generate the income of smallholder farmers. The study was conducted in Bantul and Sleman Regencies, Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia. In total of 210 beef cattle farmers were involved in semi structural interview. Data was collected in the dry season (July to September) of 2015.  Descriptive analysis was carried out for the demographic, social, economic characteristic of respondents and beef cattle farm practices. Enterprise budgeting of beef cattle farms was made to analyse farm profit, return to management and family labour that could be used in further planning for better business management. Beef cattle farming founded as an alternative that can be developed in rural communities. In order to generate the incomes in both systems, breeding and fattening, production system in term of feeding practices has to be improved so that the cost can be reduced. Scientific processing of manure has to be done for value addition in the farming system. Calving interval has to be improved in breeding system, that the best condition is 12 months and the existing condition on the respondents was 16 months. For fattening, optimizing the duration for fattening period less than 3.6 months is the best improvement. Government policy is needed to improve beef farm economic condition especially in breeding farm.




Full Text:

PDF

References


Bradford, GLandDL Debertin. 1985. Establishing linkages between economic theory and enterprise budgeting for teaching and extension programs. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics. 02: 67-76.

CBS (Central Berau of Statistic). 2013. Census of Agriculture in Indonesia. Press release of statistics No. 62/09/ XVI, Sept. 2013, 1-5. Ministry of Agriculture, Jakarta

Gowda, MJCandS Dixit. 2015. Influence of farmers educational level on comprehending, acting-upon and sharing of agro advisories. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. 2: 167-172.

Heckathorn, DD. 2011. Snowball versus respondent-driven sampling. Journal of Sociological Methodology.1: 355–366.

Huyen, LTT, PHerold,AMarkemann, andAV Zarate. 2011. Resource use, cattle performance and output patterns on different farm types in mountainous province of northern Vietnam. Journal of Animal Production Science. 7: 650-661.

Huyen, LTT,DTT Van,AMarkemann, PHerold, and AVZarate. 2012. Beef cattle keeping by smallholders in a mountainous province of northern Vietnam in relation of poverty status, community remoteness and ethnicity. Journal of Animal Production Science. 2: 163-172.

Kay, RD, WM Edwards, andPADuffy. 2008. Farm Management. Sixth Edition. McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. 1221 Avenue, New York. Pp.65-68.

Maart-Noelck, SC &O Musshof. 2013. Investing today or tomorrow ?An experimental approach to farmers’ decision behaviour.Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2: 295–318.

Ndoro,JT, MMudhara,andM Chimonyo. 2014. Livestock extension programmes participation and impact on smallholder cattle productivity in KwaZulu-Natal: A propensity score matching approach. South African Journal of Agricultural. 2: 62-80.

Paudel, KP, NR Martin,G Wehtje, andT Grey. 2013. Economic decision making using Enterprise Budgeting and Statistical Analysis: An Illustration in Wed Control Practices in Peanut Production. Journal of Production Agriculture. 1: 48-52.

Penson,JB, O Capps, and CPRosson. 2002. Introduction To Agricultural Economics. Pearson education , Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Pp. 270-277.

Salganik, MJ andDD Heckathorn. 2004. Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Journal of Sociological Methodology. 1: 193–240.

Stür, W, TTKhanh, andA Duncan. 2013. Transformation of smallholder beef cattle production in Vietnam. Int. Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 4: 363-381.

Syamsu,JA, M Yusuf,and A Abdullah. 2014. Characteristics of feed mills at farmers group scale in supporting the development of beef cattle. Journal of Advanced Agricultural Technologies. 1: 24-27.

Verschelde, M, MD’Haese, G Rayp, and EVandamme. 2013. Challenging small-scale farming: a non-parametric analysis of the (inverse) relationship between farm productivity and farm size in Burundi. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2:319–342.

Widiati R. 2006. The integration of beef cattle farming system on the farm household in Merapi Volcanic Slope, Sleman Yogyakarta (The application of linear programming analysis model toward sustainable livestock development). In: Proceeding 4th IntSemin Trop Anim Prod FacAnimSciGadjahMada Univ. Yogyakarta (Indonesia): GadjahMada University. p. 536-541.

Widiati R. 2012. Financial feasibility of beef cattle breeding with various capital aids in rural area of Gunungkidul District of Yogyakarta. Bulletin of Animal Science. 2: 1-7.

Widiati R. 2014. Developing beef cattle industry at smallholders to support beef self- sufficiency.Wartazoa24 (4):191-200.

Widi TSM. 2015. Mapping the impact of crossbreeding in smallholder cattle systems in Indonesia. Ph.D Thesis: Wageningen University, The Netherlands.

Widi, TSM, HMJ Udo,K Oldenbroek, IGSBudisatria, EBaliarti, and AJ van der Zijpp. 2015. Is crossbreeding beneficial for mixed farming systems in Central Java?. Journal of Animal Genetic Resources. 56:127-144. Doi:10.1017/S207863361500028.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Powered by OJS | Design by ThemeOJS